There is no published information on the epidemiology of wilderness rescues in California outside of national parks. The objective of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of wilderness search and rescue (SAR) missions in California and identify risk factors for individuals requiring rescue due to accidental injury, illness, or navigation errors in the California wilderness.
A retrospective review of SAR missions in California from 2018 to 2020 was conducted. This was done from a database of information collected by the California Office of Emergency Services and the Mountain Rescue Association from SAR teams, who submitted voluntarily. The subject demographics, activity, location, and outcomes of each mission were analyzed.
Eighty percent of the initial data were excluded because of incomplete or inaccurate data. Seven hundred forty-eight SAR missions involving 952 subjects were included in the study. The demographics, activities, and injuries of our population were consistent with those reported from other epidemiological SAR studies, and there were significant differences in outcomes based on the subject’s activity. For example, water activities were highly correlated with a fatal outcome.
The final data show interesting trends, but it is difficult to draw firm conclusions because so much of the initial data had to be excluded. A uniform system for reporting SAR missions in California may be helpful for further research, which may aid both SAR teams and the recreational public in understanding risk factors. A proposed SAR form for easy entry is included in the discussion section.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- United States Summary: 2010, Population and Housing Unit Counts. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2012 (30, 41)
- California travel-related spend & visitation forecast.https://industry.visitcalifornia.com/research/travel-forecastDate accessed: May 25, 2022
- Search is a time-critical event: when search and rescue missions may become futile.Wilderness Environ Med. 2007; 18: 95-101
- Epidemiology of search and rescue in Baxter State Park: dangers of descent and fatigue.Wilderness Environ Med. 2015; 26: 549-554
- Dead men walking: search and rescue in US National Parks.Wilderness Environ Med. 2009; 20: 244-249
- Adirondack Park incidents: a retrospective review of search and rescue reports from 2008 and 2009.Wilderness Environ Med. 2015; 26: 159-163
- Epidemiology of wilderness search and rescue in New Hampshire, 1999-2001.Wilderness Environ Med. 2004; 15: 11-17
- Saving tourists: the status of emergency medical services in California’s National Parks.Travel Med Infect Dis. 2009; 7: 19-24
- Emergency medical services and remote medical oversight in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, 2011-2013.Wilderness Environ Med. 2018; 29: 453-462
- Ten years of search and rescue in Yosemite National Park: examining the past for future prevention.Wilderness Environ Med. 2013; 24: 2-7
- Search and rescue in the Pacific West States.Wilderness Environ Med. 2022; 33: 43-49
- Search and rescue mission data sheet.(Available at:)https://mil.wa.gov/asset/5ba420d69bf05Date accessed: August 15, 2022
- Search and rescue annual report for 2014.(p. 129. Available at:)https://www.oregon.gov/OEM/Documents/2014_Annual_SAR_Report.pdfDate accessed: August 15, 2022
Published online: March 16, 2023
Accepted: January 30, 2023
Received: August 23, 2022
Publication stageIn Press Corrected Proof
© 2023 Wilderness Medical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.