Advertisement

Gender Equity in Membership, Leadership, and Award Recognition in the Wilderness Medical Society

      Introduction

      Despite near gender parity for women entering medical careers, women remain underrepresented in medical societies. This study evaluated the gender distribution associated with Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) activities.

      Methods

      A retrospective review was performed on the gender breakdown of the following WMS members: a single-day 2020 snapshot, conference attendees 2012 through 2020, conference presenters from winter 2017 through winter 2021, and leadership and awards data from 1984 through 2021. Genderize.io was used to generate probability-based gender categorizations (male/female) based on first names or pronoun associations.

      Results

      Gender was assigned in 91% (4043/4461) of 2020 WMS members, 92% (6179/6720) of 2012-2020 conference attendees, and 100% of remaining categories. Women represented 28% (1143/4043) of members, 27% (1679/6179) of conference attendees, 31% (143/465) of all conference presenters, 20% (62/303) of mainstage presenters, 23% (17/75) of all board members, 38% (14/37) of committee chairs, and 10% (2/20) of board presidents. Women received 18% (42/228) of recognition awards and 31% (15/48) of research grants issued.

      Conclusions

      Although women comprise a minority of WMS participants, gender distribution was similar across categories for membership, conference presenters, total board positions, and research grant awards. Relative underrepresentation was seen in the highest leadership levels, in recognition awards, and in mainstage presenters. Ongoing auditing may help to identify and address sources of bias and/or barriers to participation. Although it is only one of many components of equity, identifying successes and future opportunities for gender balance can strengthen the base of the WMS, promote growth, and ensure a strong leadership pipeline.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Butkus R.
        • Serchen J.
        • Moyer D.V.
        • Bornstein S.S.
        • Hingle S.T.
        Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians, et al. Achieving gender equity in physician compensation and career advancement: a position paper of the American College of Physicians.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 168: 721-723
        • Silver J.K.
        • Ghalib R.
        • Poorman J.A.
        • Al-Assi D.
        • Parangi S.
        • Bhargava H.
        • et al.
        Analysis of gender equity in leadership of physician-focused medical specialty societies, 2008-2017.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179: 433-435
        • Holmes M.A.
        • Asher P.
        • Farrington J.
        • Fine R.
        • Leinen M.S.
        • LeBoy P.
        Does gender bias influence awards given by societies?.
        Eos Trans AGU. 2011; 92: 421-422
        • Ma Y.
        • Oliveira D.
        • Woodruff T.
        • Uzzi B.
        Women who win prizes get less money and prestige.
        Nature. 2019; 565: 287-288
        • Shannon G.
        • Jansen M.
        • Williams K.
        • Cáceres C.
        • Motta A.
        • Odhiambo A.
        • et al.
        Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: where are we at and why does it matter?.
        Lancet. 2019; 393: 560-569
        • Nielsen M.W.
        • Alegria S.
        • Börjeson L.
        • Etzkowitz H.
        • Falk-Krzesinski H.J.
        • Joshi A.
        • et al.
        Opinion: gender diversity leads to better science.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114: 1740-1742
        • Twombly S.E.
        • Schussman L.C.
        Gender differences in injury and illness rates on wilderness backpacking trips.
        Wilderness Environ Med. 1995; 6: 363-376
        • Kuo I.C.
        • Levine R.B.
        • Gauda E.B.
        • Bodurtha J.
        • Clements J.
        • Fivushet B.
        • et al.
        Identifying gender disparities and barriers to measuring the status of female faculty: the experience of a large school of medicine.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019; 28: 1569-1575
        • Silver J.K.
        • Slocum C.S.
        • Bank A.M.
        • Bhatnagar S.
        • Blauwet C.A.
        • Poorman J.A.
        • et al.
        Where are the women? The underrepresentation of women physicians among recognition award recipients from medical specialty societies.
        PM&R. 2017; 9: 804-815
        • Wais K.
        Gender prediction methods based on first names with genderizeR.
        R Journal. 2016; 8: 17-37
        • Hannon M.
        • Duffey K.
        • Bharel S.
        • Redfield R.
        • Greidinger A.
        • Stewart E.
        • et al.
        Investigating gender disparities in internal medicine residency awards.
        Am J Med. 2021; 134: 405-409
        • James A.
        • Chisnall R.
        • Plank M.J.
        Gender and societies: a grassroots approach to women in science.
        R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6: 190633
        • Martin J.F.
        • Hewett L.
        • Gordon L.L.
        • Lewis M.C.
        • Cluver A.
        • Collins H.
        Do gender disparities among major radiological society award recipients exist?.
        Acad Radiol. 2020; 27: 987-995
        • Gerull K.M.
        • Holten A.
        • Rhea L.
        • Cipriano C.
        Is the distribution of awards gender-balanced in orthopedic surgery societies?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021; 479: 33-43
        • De Kleijn M.
        • Jayabalasingham B.
        • Falk-Krzesinski H.J.
        • Collins T.
        • Kuiper-Hoyng L.
        • Cingolani I.
        • et al.
        The Researcher Journey Through a Gender Lens: An Examination of Research Participation, Career Progression and Perceptions Across the Globe.
        Elsevier, New York, NY2020 (Available at:)
        www.elsevier.com/gender-report
        Date accessed: November 23, 2021
        • Exley C.L.
        • Kessler J.B.
        The gender gap in self-promotion. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. 2019;26345.
        (Available at:)
        https://www.nber.org/papers/w26345
        Date accessed: November 23, 2021
        • Fang A.C.
        • Chekijian S.A.
        • Zeidan A.J.
        • Choo E.K.
        • Sethuraman K.N.
        National awards and female emergency physicians in the United States: is the “recognition gap” closing?.
        J Emerg Med. 2021; 61: 540-549
        • Isaac C.
        • Lee B.
        • Carnes M.
        Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: a systematic review.
        Acad Med. 2009; 84: 1440-1446
        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty, 2019.
        AAMC, 2019 (Available at:)
        • Crowe R.P.
        • Krebs W.
        • Cash R.E.
        • Rivard M.K.
        • Lincoln E.W.
        • Panchal A.R.
        Females and minority racial/ethnic groups remain underrepresented in emergency medical services: a ten-year assessment, 2008–2017.
        Prehospital Emerg Care. 2020; 24: 180-187
        • Outdoor Foundation
        2021 outdoor participation trends report. Outdoor industry association.
        (Available at:)
        • Backhus L.M.
        • Kpodonu J.
        • Romano J.C.
        • Pelletier G.J.
        • Preventza O.
        • Cooke D.T.
        An exploration of myths, barriers, and strategies for improving diversity among STS members.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 1617-1624
        • Neumayer L.
        • Kaiser S.
        • Anderson K.
        • Barney L.
        • Curet M.
        • Jacobs D.
        • et al.
        Perceptions of women medical students and their influence on career choice.
        Am J Surg. 2002; 183: 146-150
      1. Acuña AJ, Sato EH, Jella TK, Samuel LT, Jeong SH, Chen AF. How long will it take to reach gender parity in orthopedic surgery in the United States? An analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 479(6):1179–89.

        • Parker R.B.
        • Stack S.J.
        • Schneider S.M.
        ACEP Diversity Summit 2016 Attendees. Why diversity and inclusion are critical to the American College of Emergency Physicians’ future success.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2017; 69: 714-717
        • Potvin D.A.
        • Burdfield-Steel E.
        • Potvin J.M.
        • Heap S.M.
        Diversity begets diversity: A global perspective on gender equality in scientific society leadership.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13e0197280
        • Sambunjak D.
        • Straus S.E.
        • Marusić A.
        Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.
        JAMA. 2006; 296: 1103-1115
        • Blankenship N.G.
        • Slaw K.M.
        Recruiting and engaging young early career physicians.
        in: 2015 Trends Identification Report. American Association of Medical Society Executives, St. Paul, MN2015: 15-17 (Available at:)
        • Blankenship J.C.
        • Abbott B.G.
        • Lindenfeld J.
        • Wiegers S.E.
        • Rosenfield K.
        Multi-society presidents’ page: the value of membership in your sub-specialty society.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88: 671-673