Advertisement
Concepts| Volume 28, ISSUE 3, P219-224, September 2017

The Provision of Prescription-Only Medicines for Use on UK-based Overseas Expeditions

      Expedition teams without accompanying medical professionals traveling overseas from the UK frequently carry medical kits containing prescription-only medicines (POMs). Access to safe, basic POMs whilst on expedition is important, as the quality and availability of medicines in-country may not be acceptable, and delay in treatment may be hazardous. At present, there is no published guidance relating to drug acquisition and administration in these situations. In the UK, a number of different practices are currently in use, with uncertainty and medicolegal concerns currently hampering safe and efficient provision of POMs on overseas expeditions. A guideline is proposed for the management of prescription-only medications in an expedition setting.

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Expedition parties such as school trips, charity challenges, adventure races, explorers, or journalists traveling abroad from the UK frequently carry medical kits containing prescription-only medicines (POMs). Access to safe, basic POMs whilst on expedition is important, as the quality and availability of medicines in-country may not be acceptable and delay in treatment may be hazardous.
      Expeditions without accompanying medical professionals rely on nonmedics administering POMs, and at present there is no published guidance relating to drug acquisition and administration in these situations, despite previously documented concerns.
      • Shlim D.
      • Langer C.
      Are expedition medical kits too dangerous to carry?.
      A number of different practices are currently in use, with uncertainty and medicolegal apprehension currently hampering safe and efficient provision of POMs on overseas expeditions.
      A guideline is proposed for the management of prescription-only medications for UK expeditions unaccompanied by a trained medical professional. This paper has been compiled by 4 authors with extensive expedition experience, and who provide medical support, training, and medication to expeditions leaving the UK. It is hoped that by clarifying the clinical and legal position within UK practice, this guidance will be useful for those who practice expedition and wilderness medicine, whilst encouraging international colleagues to review local protocols.

      Medical Kits for Remote Travel

      Expedition members accept their activities come with risk of injury and illness, potentially far from healthcare. The range of medical problems is well documented, and there are a number of handbooks providing guidance on expedition medicine.
      Access to a range of medicines is an essential requirement of any expeditionary activity, and not all groups have an accompanying medically qualified expedition medical officer.
      Obtaining medications prior to departure is a necessity, as the quality and availability of medications available overseas is variable.

      Bulletin of the World Health Organization. Growing threat from counterfeit medicines. Available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/88/4/10-020410/en/. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      Most groups will plan to carry a small range of POMs, mainly antibiotics, analgesics, and antiemetics.
      Expedition types vary greatly, affecting both the level of medical support and the manner in which medicines are obtained. Expedition companies/charities (referred to as commercial expeditions) often employ the services of a medical advisor (MA)—a medical professional with expedition experience and knowledge. Smaller, individually organized (noncommercial) expeditions will typically source their own medical kits and healthcare advice. Clause 6.7 of the British Safety Standard 8848
      BS 8848:2014.
      Specification for the provision of visits, fieldwork, expeditions and adventurous activities outside the United Kingdom..
      highlights, specifically, the responsibilities of expedition providers in relation to the provision of suitable first aid and medical kits, and medical training and support.

      Guidelines Development

      The Royal Geographical Society Medical Advisory Committee (RGS-MAC)

      Royal Geograpical Society. Expedition Medical Cell. Available at: http://www.rgs.org/OurWork/Fieldwork+and+Expeditions/Specialist+Advice/Medical+Cell/Expedition+Medical+Cell.htm. Accessed February 23, 2017.

      was established in 1996, with a remit to provide medical advice and support to overseas expeditions. Since its creation, the RGS-MAC has been involved in research publications relating to health and safety in remote and wilderness environments, culminating in the development of 2 of the UK’s most significant expedition health and safety publications.
      BS 8848:2014.
      Specification for the provision of visits, fieldwork, expeditions and adventurous activities outside the United Kingdom..
      Guidelines were developed from a position paper produced and subsequently discussed at a meeting of the RGS-MAC. These set out what the authors believe should be adopted as best practice. To summarize in a “statement of need”:
      “In the absence of an appropriately qualified expedition medical officer, the authors wish to develop a mechanism that legally permits nonmedically qualified individuals, in an emergency situation, to carry a small number of prescription-only medicines, supplied in the UK prior to departure, for the treatment of illness or injury for the benefit of expedition team members.”

      Provision of Prescription-Only Medicines and UK Law

      Obtaining and carrying POMs in the UK is governed by the Human Medicines Regulations 2012
      Human Medicines Regulations 2012. Statutory Instrument 2012. No. 289(7719–7720):200. TSO, London.
      (amended 2014, replacing the Medicines Act 1968

      Medicines Act 1968. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/67/contents. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      ). Legislation is interpreted and enforced by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
      Furthermore, the MHRA produces guidelines intended to make practices safer still, though there is a precedent for the MHRA agreeing not to enforce such guidelines in particular circumstances. The MHRA has identified alternative practices for certain groups whose roles and environment require them to work outside existing legislation. For example, British Army Combat Medical Technicians are required to carry and use medications overseas.
      Those involved in prescribing are bound by professional codes of practice. The General Medical Council (GMC), the Nursing and Midwifery Council, and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society have issued standards and frameworks for prescribers

      General Medical Council. Good medical practice (2013). Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice.asp. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      General Medical Council. Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Prescribing_guidance.pdf_59055247.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards of proficiency for nurse and midwife prescribers. Available at: https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/additional-standards/standards-of-proficiency-for-nurse-and-midwife-prescribers/. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Prescribing Competency Framework. Available at: https://www.rpharms.com/resources/frameworks/prescribers-competency-framework. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      that are applicable to expedition medicine and prescribing for expeditions.
      Unlike legislation that may only apply within the UK, professional bodies may take a view and make judgment on the activities of practitioners wherever in the world they work.

      Current Practice

      Supply

      Provision of POMs in the UK for overseas expeditions are covered by private prescriptions, as the activity falls outside provisions of the UK National Health Service. Medicines can be supplied to an expedition in 1 of 4 ways:
      Expeditions with no medical professional in attendance:
      • 1.
        To an individual on the expedition either under a patient group direction

        National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Patient group directions. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mpg2. Accessed September 22, 2016.

        or via a private prescription. This is normally undertaken by a registered general practitioner (GP), registered Care Quality Commission clinic or registered General Pharmaceutical Society pharmacy. Anecdotal evidence would suggest that even though the medicines are prescribed to 1 individual, when out of the UK they are used as “group medicines” and given to unnamed expedition members as and when medical needs arise. This is, in effect, treating a patient with someone else’s medicines.
      • 2.
        To an expedition leader (EL) via an expedition company’s MA who uses his or her own stock. Such stock is obtained via a pharmaceutical wholesaler in original and unlabelled packs. A pharmacy with a wholesaler dealer’s license may supply medicines to a medical practitioner for their own stock. This stock will require careful repacking and clear labelling to make it suitable for its intended purpose. Before departure, the MA supplies medicines to a named individual on the expedition—normally the EL. This individual is carrying the medicine on behalf of the company MA. In the absence of a trained medical professional (the ideal scenario), ELs often have a dual role, acting as both medics and leaders. Where authority is delegated (preferably through a written and signed agreement), direction on safe storage and proper use of medicines should be provided by the MA, who remains ultimately responsible. The approach of supplying from own stock for group use is the most contentious in the view of the MHRA and warrants further discussion.
      • 3.
        Medicines and medical care are sourced in country, by the individual patient or the medical officer.
        Expeditions with a medical officer:
      • 4.
        If a medical officer with prescribing privileges accompanies the expedition, he or she may dispense medications as required. This model is directly analogous to a GP who carries medicines in the doctor’s bag for emergency use.
      All 4 options seek to balance UK law for the safe prescribing and supply of medicines, against the need to treat individuals abroad in situations where access to safe and adequate healthcare may be either unavailable or suboptimal in quality.

      Carrying Medicines Across International Borders

      Carrying medicines across international borders is usually restricted to those for personal use, usually no more than 1 month’s supply, with extra restrictions applied to narcotics and psychotropics. Larger quantities may officially need an import license.
      • Goodyer L.I.
      • Rajani M.S.
      Carrying medicines across international borders.
      Whether a medical kit falls into the category requiring such a license depends on the country in question, though it would always be good practice for a larger kit to be accompanied by a letter of authorization from the prescribing clinician, along with a statement highlighting that any medicines are for the sole use of the expedition members and are not the subject of any commercial transaction. In practice, smaller quantities of appropriately packaged and labelled medicines would not normally create problems.

      Step-by-Step Guidelines for the Provision of POMs to Groups on Expedition Without an Accompanying Medical Officer

      In the absence of a medical officer, many expeditions currently utilize method 1 or 2 above, or a variation thereof. The authors suggest the following guidelines in an attempt to bring the use of POMs on overseas expeditions within a legal framework.

      Option 1—Individual Medical Kits

      • 1.
        In liaison with the expedition company, the MA draws up a list of recommended medications for a given expedition.
      • 2.
        Using the MA’s recommendations, a prescription is provided to participants by their GP or another prescriber with expertise in expedition medicine (see point 3).
      • 3.
        The prescriber must:
        • a.
          Check the recommended drug list is suitable for the patient.
        • b.
          Provide clear written directions about how and why to take each POM, including possible side effects and reasons to stop treatment (some of this information may be present in the drug patient information leaflet (PIL).
        • c.
          Provide advice about any follow-up required following the use of POM (eg, blood tests, review consultation, etc.).
        • d.
          Provide accurate written storage guidance for the medications.
        • e.
          Provide specific advice regarding medicine import and export restrictions.
        • f.
          Provide a covering letter for the participant to carry—this may be helpful in explaining to authorities why the POMs are being transported.
      The individual is issued their personal medication from a pharmacist. As the medication is being prescribed for conditions which would arise while travelling outside the UK, the GP should issue a private prescription. However, GPs may not be willing to issue prescriptions for conditions or situations that fall outside their normal area of expertise.

      Option 2—Group Medical Kit

      If an MA is personally supplying a team kit for use by all members, they must:
      • 1.
        Order supplies directly from a pharmacy (including online pharmacies) with a wholesaler’s license, for delivery to the expedition organization and ensure they are safely stored.
        • a.
          Supervise appropriate packaging and labelling of the medications.
        • b.
          Provide written instructions on the use of the medicines in each medical kit.
        • c.
          Ensure adequate training of EL regarding the use of the medical kit.
        • d.
          Provide further advice on follow-up, storage, and transportation (see paragraphs 3c through e, above).
        • e.
          Undertake adequate medical screening of all individuals on the expedition (see paragraph 3a, above).
        • f.
          Highlight any medicines that may be contraindicated for certain members of the team, identifying these medications to the EL and the individual.
        • g.
          Provide instruction on how medicines are selected, checked, and issued.
      • 2.
        Make all team members aware of the MA’s guidance regarding self-treatment and supply to third parties.
      • 3.
        Arrange for the team medical kit to be carried overseas by the EL. The POMs remain the property of the MA alone, and only those screened by the MA may make use of the medications, according to company guidelines.
      • 4.
        In the event that a POM is needed, authorization for their use should be confirmed in 1 of 3 ways. In order of preference:
        • a.
          Seek telemedical advice from an appropriate UK doctor. Recommendations for telephone consultations are already available from the GMC.

          General Medical Council. Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Prescribing_guidance.pdf_59055247.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2016.

          This may be the MA, the patient’s own GP (if they are willing), or an MA at a medical assistance or insurance company. They confirm clinical details and provide advice on treatment. Ideally, the prescriber would advise, since they may be in a position to refer to the participant’s medical information. The availability of satellite communication greatly facilitates obtaining medical advice. Some medical assistance companies can set up conference calls, which include the patient, the EL, an assistance company medic, and expedition organizers.
        • b.
          Depending upon the qualification and training of the clinician, taking local advice maybe be an option. Whilst often having considerable experience of country-specific medical problems, anecdotal evidence would suggest in-country physicians can also be risk averse when dealing with UK groups, particularly adolescents. Furthermore, there is a risk of unfamiliar and unnecessary drugs being prescribed. However, as previously highlighted, the manufacturing quality of local medicines, or risk of counterfeit drugs, is a global issue for modern healthcare.

          Bulletin of the World Health Organization. Growing threat from counterfeit medicines. Available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/88/4/10-020410/en/. Accessed September 22, 2016.

        • c.
          In an emergency and in the absence of professional healthcare advice, the EL may either
          • i.
            Resort to simple first aid measures.
          • ii.
            Adhere to previously written instructions for the management of illness on the expedition. Instructions for treatment should be made as clear as possible, tailored to the level of medical training provided. PILs may also be useful. Nonmedics using this option should adhere to the POM administration flow chart (Figure 1) which can be used each time a medication is dispensed.
            Figure
            Figure 1Drug administration checklist for the safe administration of medicines by non-medically trained individuals.
          • iii.
            Select the medication from the kit and confirm the name and dose with another adult and the patient. The patient is deemed to be supplied by the MA according to their instructions, not by the person carrying the medical kit.
      • 5.
        Accurate records are kept by the EL, including the history, examination, advice received, management recommended, and medications used.
      • 6.
        On return to UK, the MA should consider whether any medical follow-up is required for anyone treated on expedition.
      • 7.
        Any medication that has been dispensed on expedition must be recorded on a patient’s individual record card. On return to the home country, medical records must be stored securely by the expedition medical officer. It may be advisable in some circumstances for information to be shared with the patient’s family doctor or specialist.
      • 8.
        POMs that are undamaged, have not been exposed to extremes of temperature, and remain in date may be retained for future trips. Other medication (including those medications purchased overseas) should be given to a pharmacist for disposal, either in the host country or on return home.
      • 9.
        Liability in the event of mishap on expedition remains unclear.
        • a.
          If the medical officer has issued instructions that a supplied medicine is only to be used under medical supervision, and the expedition member does not follow that instruction, then the prescriber is unlikely to carry liability (to the authors’ knowledge, yet to be tested in law).
        • b.
          If a local practitioner makes an error then it would be their responsibility.
        • c.
          In the case where a medicine is prescribed for an individual, and is taken by that individual and something goes wrong that good prescribing practice would have prevented, then, under UK law, the prescriber is responsible.
        • d.
          The most significant (and potentially most likely) event surrounds an adverse drug reaction following the administration of POMs by an EL without prior medical consultation (perhaps as a result of restricted communication or emergency situation). In this situation, there is potential for the prescriber to be saddled with contributory liability. However, this, to the authors’ knowledge, has yet to be tested in the expedition setting.
      The authors propose the following further work: (1) discuss the proposed guideline with the MHRA; (2) invite feedback and comment from the wider expedition community; (3) encourage dialogue with medical professional indemnity companies to promote understanding and support for the guidelines; and (4) seek medicolegal clarification, particularly around the areas of liability.
      The solutions suggested are relevant to UK-based expeditions. The current situation in countries other than the UK is not clear and requires further research involving clinicians familiar with local medical law. This could involve organizations such as the International Climbing and Mountaineering Federation (UIAA) Medical Commission.

      Conclusions

      Expedition teams travelling abroad frequently carry medical kits containing POMs, as the quality and availability of medicines in-country may not be acceptable, and delay in treatment hazardous. Expeditions without accompanying medical professionals rely on nonmedics administering POMs, and at present there is no published guidance relating to drug acquisition and administration in these situations.
      These guidelines suggest a workable protocol for the management of POMs in an expedition environment. In many areas, it exceeds the individual codes of practice of the professional groups involved, but by necessity, some aspects of the protocol fall outside normal practice of medicines management.
      Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge Mrs. Shane Winsor of the Medical Advisory Body, Royal Geographical Society, who provided support and guidance for this publication.
      Author Contributions: Study concept and design: (ML), (LG); drafting of the manuscript: (ML); critical revision of the manuscript: (JM), (JD); approval of final manuscript: (JM), (JD), (ML), (LG).Financial/material support: None.Disclosure statement: ML is medical advisor to a UK-based commercial tour operator, chief medical officer of an international charity, and medical director of a not-for-profit medical training organization.

      References

        • Shlim D.
        • Langer C.
        Are expedition medical kits too dangerous to carry?.
        J Travel Med. 2012; 19: 205-206
      1. Johnson C. Anderson S. Dallimore J. Imray C. Winser S. Moore J. Oxford Handbook of Expedition and Wilderness Medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK2015
      2. Auerbach P. Constance B. Freer L. Field Guide to Wilderness Medicine. 4th ed. Mosby, Maryland Heights, MO2013
      3. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. Growing threat from counterfeit medicines. Available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/88/4/10-020410/en/. Accessed September 22, 2016.

        • BS 8848:2014.
        Specification for the provision of visits, fieldwork, expeditions and adventurous activities outside the United Kingdom..
        British Standards Institution, London2014
      4. Royal Geograpical Society. Expedition Medical Cell. Available at: http://www.rgs.org/OurWork/Fieldwork+and+Expeditions/Specialist+Advice/Medical+Cell/Expedition+Medical+Cell.htm. Accessed February 23, 2017.

      5. Human Medicines Regulations 2012. Statutory Instrument 2012. No. 289(7719–7720):200. TSO, London.
      6. Medicines Act 1968. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/67/contents. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      7. General Medical Council. Good medical practice (2013). Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice.asp. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      8. General Medical Council. Good practice in prescribing and managing medicines and devices. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Prescribing_guidance.pdf_59055247.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      9. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Standards of proficiency for nurse and midwife prescribers. Available at: https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/additional-standards/standards-of-proficiency-for-nurse-and-midwife-prescribers/. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      10. Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Prescribing Competency Framework. Available at: https://www.rpharms.com/resources/frameworks/prescribers-competency-framework. Accessed September 22, 2016.

      11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Patient group directions. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mpg2. Accessed September 22, 2016.

        • Goodyer L.I.
        • Rajani M.S.
        Carrying medicines across international borders.
        J Br Travel Health Assoc. 2009; 23: 35-37